Tarot of the Ages of Humanity

Before we start:

I am a hobbyist designer of Tarot and Tarot-like decks.  It’s a good time.  Playing with semiotics is fun. 

Unfortunately, throwing ideas around — even in a systematized way — turns out to be a whole lot easier than actually doing complete art writeups.  And even doing a full suite of complete art writeups is much, much, much easier than causing an actual deck to come into existence.  Especially if you’re not any kind of visual artist yourself, which I am definitely not. 

The upshot is that I come up with lots of deck concepts, and end up throwing almost all of them away, because I know that I will never really want to put in in the time/energy/money to do anything real with them.  Which feels like a colossal waste. 

So I’m trying something new.  This deck concept is hereby released, with no strings attached, into public ownership.  If you like it, feel free to do whatever you want with it. 

…maybe someone who isn’t me will see fit to do something cool. 


The Tarot of the Ages of Humanity is a 36-card oracle deck, divided into six suits of six cards each.  Fundamentally, it’s just about six thematic concepts, and the symbols and resonances that you get when you recombine and explore them.

“Ages of Humanity,” as used here, refers not to the stages of an individual life — at least, not directly, not in the Shakespearean sense — but rather to the stages of history.

The basic idea is that you can sketch the development of civilization  as taking place through six thematically-distinct paradigms.  Which are cyclical, if you believe that new vitality arises from decay and collapse.  (This is not to say that these paradigms can be precisely mapped onto specific periods of history as a whole, or onto specific periods of the history of any given society.  They really can’t, as you’ll see.  But…they’re all recognizable, and they cohere conceptually, and our perception of the world flows very naturally from one into the next.  They make a story that very much feels like the grand story of the world, even if it’s hard to make the details fit.)

Each paradigm creates its own environment, which fosters and encourages a different way-of-being.  The Defining Human of each paradigm is a different sort of person.

All of this makes for potent symbolism, because — guess what? — none of those paradigms ever ceases to be relevant.  Wherever civilization happens to be at a given moment, the archetypes of past and future will still serve to define our lives and our psychology.  So a Tarot card saying “think about this paradigm” or “think about that paradigm” has power.

Let’s spell all of this out, briefly, for illustrative purposes:

The Red Suit, which centers on the figure of Human-as-Beast, is about natural struggle.  It corresponds to the hunter-gatherer phase of civilization, where the stories are primarily concerned with meeting basic needs and satisfying immediate desires.  (This is not really about privation, whether physical or intellectual or spiritual; the hunter-gatherer lifestyle has a lot going for it, in terms of satisfying the core values of the human psyche, that no other paradigm can match.)  Encountering the Red Suit paradigm is a reminder that on some fundamental level you are still basically an animal in the wild, just like everyone else around you, and that the world is pretty much a jungle.  The basic aesthetic is tribal and primitive, with lots of animal skins and so forth. 

The Orange Suit, which centers on the figure of Human-as-Cultivator, is about natural mastery.  It corresponds to the agricultural phase of civilization, where the stories are primarily concerned with controlling the environment through diligent work and hard-won practical wisdom.  Encountering the Orange Suit paradigm is a reminder that effort yields reward, that technical domain knowledge matters, that community is a defense against chaos, and that traditions have worth.  The basic aesthetic is “rustic farming village” — I can’t help imagining it as basically English, y’know, the sort of setting where you find maypoles.

The Yellow Suit, which centers on the figure of Human-as-Hero, is about social struggle.  It corresponds to the classical phase of civilization, where the stories are primarily concerned with the acquisition of power and glory through conflict.  (The basic scenario here is “fighting for a cause” — to a modern conception, this will usually be an ideological cause, although the antecedent archetypes hearken back to causes like “the greatness of King Such-and-such.”)  Encountering the Yellow Suit paradigm is a reminder that some things are worth risk and difficulty, that the world is full of potential allies and enemies, and that there is merit in valor and other forms of active virtue.  The basic aesthetic is an Near Eastern melange, mostly Persian, but with Arabian and Egyptian and Hellenistic elements…something that can communicate, non-specifically, “the ancient days when kings were always fighting each other.”   

The Green Suit, which centers on the figure of Human-as-Ruler, is about social mastery.  It corresponds to the imperial/feudal phase of civilization,  where the stories are primarily concerned with the maintenance and exaltation of lasting ideals.   (And, especially, about the instantiation of those ideals in grand institutions: State and Church.)  Encountering the Green Suit paradigm is a reminder that there is great power for goodness in norms and rules, that there is great responsibility both in being an authority and in being a subordinate, and that salvation-of-spirit (whatever that is) can be found through appeal to a higher power (whatever that is).  The basic aesthetic is straight-up High Gothic Medieval. 

The Blue Suit, which centers on the figure of Human-as-Sage, is about conceptual struggle.  It corresponds to the scientific/exploratory phase of civilization, where the stories are primarily concerned with pushing back the boundaries of ignorance.  Encountering the Blue Suit paradigm is a reminder that knowledge is built on evidence, that there is understanding in abstraction and quantification, that truth is often counterintuitive, and that the new can be better and bolder than the old.  The basic aesthetic is somewhere in the neighborhood of Renaissance Florentine. 

The Violet Suit, which centers on the figure of Human-as-Icon, is about conceptual mastery.  it corresponds to the decadent phase of civilization, where the stories are primarily concerned with extracting meaning from life — finding engagement with the world-as-a-whole (and pushing back against nihilistic ennui) through refined emotion and symbolic definition.  Encountering the Violet Suit paradigm is a reminder that beauty and purpose are human creations, that life must be made worth the living, and that even the greatest knowledge and the greatest power will die if they are empty at heart.  The basic aesthetic is Belle Époque Parisian, more or less.

And then the decadence of the Violet Suit, after a brief interregnum of civilization-smashing apocalypse, fades back into the simple bright vigor of the Red Suit.

(You can even set these up in a color-wheel, reflecting a very-notional Cycle of Ages, with the opposed pairs of Red/Green, Orange/Blue, and Yellow/Violet manifesting the greatest conceptual tension.  Possibly that would make for a good back-of-the-card design.)

Of course, it’s not quite that simple.  The whole cycle exists within each individual paradigm, right?  Wherever and whenever you are: there will always be Red Suit emotional immediacy, Orange Suit pragmatic worldliness, Yellow Suit active contention, and so on.  Every world has beasts and cultivators, heroes and rulers, sages and icons.  But all those things are shaped and defined by their environment.  Red-ness looks different in a Red world than it does in a Green world.  The symbols multiply.

And all those multiplied symbols are relevant, because the whole cycle exists within each individual paradigm, recursively.  So when we look out at the world in which we live — whatever paradigm seems, from one vantage point, to predominate — we will in fact encounter all six paradigms.  And within each of those we’ll encounter all six paradigms.  And within each of those…  The meanings, and correspondences, grow exponentially.

But six-by-six is enough for most everyday contemplative, and divinatory, purposes.


The actual card list looks something like this:


The Red Beast:  The Dragon.  An elemental force of savage instinct.  The drive to slake one’s lusts, and give vent to one’s urges, with no thought for anything beyond the moment.  A pure prime archetype.

The Red Cultivator:  The Forager.   A manifestation of hard work and skill within the uncompromising world of the real.  Someone who does what must be done, and learns what must be learned, in order to make it through the day.

The Red Hero:  The Hunter.  A brave risk-taker who struggles against the dangers of the wild, for nothing more than the hope of food for the morrow…and for the chance to awe tribe, and self, with bold cunning…and perhaps for the simple joy of pitting himself or herself against the world.  

The Red Ruler:  The Chieftain.  A leader of men and women, hard but just and caring, whose commands guide them through a world filled with peril.  Someone who holds onto his or her power through sheer strength, determination, and charisma alone.

The Red Sage:  The Shaman. A living channel for the numinous hidden wisdom of the world.  Someone who opens up his or her spirit to channel the words of lets higher powers.  Someone whose life is given to understanding, and mastering, a reality that cannot be understood. 

The Red Icon:  The Dancer.  A dweller in artless wordless ecstasy, a font of beauty and joy.  Someone who can stand in for all the sweaty primal pleasures that make even the most unexamined life worth living.


The Orange Beast:  The Bull.  An elemental force of directed persistence.  The drive to keep pulling at the plow, to put in the work that must be done, come what may. 

The Orange Cultivator:  The Planter.  One who labors now for a yield later, who is willing to care for the future.  Someone who trusts in his technique.  Someone who trusts in the world to continue making sense.  A force of fertility, happiness, and responsibility.  A pure prime archetype.

The Orange Hero:  The Sentinel. A stalwart defender who puts himself or herself on the line for a community.  Someone who expects danger, and prepares, without wishing to seek it.  Someone determined to keep home and family safe.  

The Orange Ruler:  The Patriarch.  A leader of an intimate, communitarian group.  A master of the world in which he lives, well-versed in tradition and long-hallowed custom, who relies on his wisdom to guide his people through hardships. 

The Orange Sage:  The Witch.  A wielder of mysterious arts, who can offer practical solutions to practical problems.  Someone set apart from the mainstream community by dint of an unusual specialization. 

The Orange Icon:  The Harvest Maiden. A living emblem of contentment, wealth, and fecundity.  Someone who can stand in for well-earned simple joys, for the blessings of family, and for the rewards of labor. 


The Yellow Beast:  The Lion. An elemental force of glory and victory.  The drive to stand dominant over foes, to achieve legend, to carve one’s name into the firmament of history. 

The Yellow Cultivator:  The Scribe.  A skillful, dedicated soul who works hard for the sake of a worldly cause.  Someone who tells, records, or amplifies the story of a thing in which he or she believes.  

The Yellow Hero:  The Conqueror.  A daring warrior and achiever, especially one who contends with enemies, whose valor advances some greater agenda.  An active player in the drama of the world.  A pure prime archetype. 

The Yellow Ruler:  The Vizier.  A politician — which is to say, a manipulator of men and women– for whom rules and commands are a system that must be employed to achieve a purpose.  An administrator or commander seeking to guide a collective towards a goal.    

The Yellow Sage:  The Adviser.  A teacher, strategist, or specialist who lends his or her mind to a greater endeavor in hopes of helping it transcend its own limits.  Someone whose mastery, or discovery, of the world’s secrets is used to achieve a concrete ambition.    

The Yellow Icon:  The Concubine.  A human prize, who embodies desirability and success and splendor.  Someone who can stand in for the joys of basking in greatness.   


The Green Beast:  The Griffon.  An elemental force of lawfulness, stability, and sanctity.  The drive towards reverence and exaltation.  The power to grasp eternity.   

The Green Cultivator: The Monastic. A contemplative soul who dedicates his or her labors and meditations towards communion with a transcendent power.  Someone who cultivates faith in the order of the world. 

The Green Hero:  The Knight.  A devoted fighter, bound by law and honor, whose battles are sanctified and justified by a higher ideal.  Someone who braves peril to do what is right.    A sworn agent of the status quo. 

The Green Ruler:  The Emperor.  A great leader, holding justice and compassion in perfect balance, who reigns over the unchanging excellence of a sacred realm.  An absolute authority who bears absolute responsibility.  A pure prime archetype.

The Green Sage:  The Canon Doctor.  A learned scholar who seeks to use human reason to approach ineffable truths.  Someone seeking to understand the deepest, truest nature of the world and its systems. 

The Green Icon:  The Saint.  An exemplar of divinity-within-humanity, whose thoughts and deeds are pure.  Someone who can stand in for the holiest and most profound values of society.


The Blue Beast:  The Serpent.  An elemental force of subtlety, curiosity, and insight.  The drive to seek out every hidden thing, to understand every mystery, and to shatter every conceptual limitation.

The Blue Cultivator:  The Alchemist.  A person of great technical knowledge and skill, who possesses a deep abstract understanding of the concrete world.  Someone who seeks to wield knowledge for practical and worldly purposes…or who employs practical, worldly arts for the sake of advancing knowledge. 

The Blue Hero:  The Navigator.  A sojourner who ventures forth into the frightening unknown, guided by intelligence, eager to make new discoveries and to behold new wonders.  Someone who undergoes hardship to win intellectual laurels. 

The Blue Ruler:  The Philosopher-King.  A ruler whose rulership is founded upon, and guided by, reason.  An authority who seeks to employ expertise and insight to optimize his domain.  A living symbol of a theory-driven society. 

The Blue Sage:  The Sorcerer.  A brilliant researcher and wonder-worker who bends all his or her intellect towards learning new truths and expanding the limits of the possible.  A dynamo who dwells in the universe of pure understanding.  A pure prime archetype.

The Blue Icon:  The Created Woman. A beautiful, artificially-made Frankensteinian homunculus.  Someone who can stand in for all the glories that are achievable through understanding, science, and applied wisdom. 


The Violet Beast:  The Unicorn.  An elemental force of artistry, reflection, and profound-but-subtle emotionality.  The drive towards introspection, obsession, and nostalgia. 

The Violet Cultivator: The Musician.  An emotional laborer, dedicated to the task of filling the world with beauty and meaning that others can appreciate.  Someone who understands the technical craft of manipulating feeling. 

The Violet Hero:  The Duelist.  A bravo, able and willing to inflict harm — and to suffer harm — for the sake of deep personal sentiment.  Someone willing to invest all he has into the grand gesture, which can communicate a grand commitment of identity.   

The Violet Ruler:  The Symposiarch.  A leader whom others follow towards emotional and symbolic fulfillment.  Someone who controls how others celebrate and mourn, love and believe.  A psychological or ritual authority. 

The Violet Sage:  The Mentalist.  A person of great insight, who apprehends the workings of the human psyche, who can perceive human structures of meaning well enough to alter (or even create) them.  Someone skilled in the arts of psychology, therapy, semiotics, or self-development.

The Violet Icon:  The Muse.  A person whose very life has transcended into art, upon whom others can project their most powerful feelings, in whom others can find the purpose they seek.  Someone who can stand in for the strange, ineffable promise of existence.  A pure prime archetype.



A lot of the basic concepts here — and certainly much of the color imagery — are taken from the Theosophical Rays, and from their deep-delve-crazy elaboration and reinterpretation in the work of the incomparable Rory Goff.  (Seriously, kids, hardcore semiotics can be hazardous to your epistemic health, don’t try this at home…)  Obviously there has been a lot of folding, spindling, and mutilating to make my own symbolic suite hang together.

I recognize that, in such an allegedly anthropocentric Tarot, the totemic figures of the Beasts feel a bit odd.  Nonetheless I think they belong.  Even if their Red-tinged symbolism is really about various forms of human “beastliness,” the human-as-beast is not a symbol we’re really capable of parsing at this juncture.  It’s too intuitive to look at the figure of a person — any person — and immediately see it as a sophisticated complicated being with all kinds of internalized abstractions.  Pure elemental power, of any kind, needs a totem to be legible as such.  That’s why the classic Tarot Aces are as stark as they are, and that’s why my Beasts are Beasts.

This whole thing is somewhat hacked-together.  Suggestions, thoughts, and improvements welcome (for the sake of anyone who decides to pick up the project in any way).

Tarot of the Ages of Humanity

5 thoughts on “Tarot of the Ages of Humanity

  1. Vesper Von Eternity says:

    Of curiosity: how strongly do you see these archetypes as being gendered? There seems to be a mix of obviously-gendered cards (the Patriarch, the Created Woman), subtly gendered cards (the Duelist, the Advisor — both presented as “he” even though you “he or she” others) and cards that aren’t so much obviously gendered (the Scribe, the Chieftain and some others specify “he or she,” the Musician, the Saint and several others aren’t ever given pronouns). What’s up with that?


    1. Depends on the card.

      Most of the archetypes here are not gendered at all, or at least aren’t meant to be. Presumably an actual illustrated card would depict a particular person of a particular sex, but that would be largely arbitrary, and I hope the artist would go for a balance.

      (The Adviser should be totally gender-neutral in concept. I just flubbed the prose. It’s been edited.)

      There are some exceptions. Most notably, all six Icons basically have to be female, in my eyes. “Having other people project their symbolic needs on you” is a hugely gendered thing, and pretty much always has been everywhere, to the point that any one of those cards being male would feel like a cop-out or a lie. Maaaaaaaybe you could make an exception for the Saint, if you decided to do a Christ figure instead of a Mary / Joan of Arc figure. But even then I think femininity gets at the realness better.

      There’s no comparable strain of dudeliness, but there are a couple of cards that really want to be male rather than female. Specifically the two you call out, the Duelist and the Patriarch. “Being the master of the family unit” is strongly male-coded, at least in my symbolic vocabulary, and so is “getting into actual serious fights specifically for reasons of symbolism and passion.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s